Taxonomic identification report

Sample ID: MP23-0431_rbcL

[analysis description + link to github repo]

Facility	Hogwarts
Analyst	John Doe
Analysis started	2025-05-03 01:28:16
Analysis completed	2025-05-03 01:28:16
Wall time	0:0:0 hours

Result overview

Inconclusive

Outcome: The analyst should attempt subjective species identification at the genus level.

Reasoning: [Flag 1C] >3 candidate species matched with high stringency (identity ≥ 98.5%).

Preliminary morphology ID confirmed?	NA
Inconclusive taxonomic identity (Flag 1C) Planta.

This Preliminary Morphology ID has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error).

For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity.

	Coverage of Planta
	Coverage of species in genus Planta
	Coverage of species in genus Planta in country of origin Indonesia

Database coverage of Planta

Flag 5.1C: The reference data are likely to be unreliable for this species
Reasoning: The given locus for this taxon is not present in reference database (0 entries)

0 records

There are 0 sequences in the reference database for Planta at the given locus rbcL.

Global occurrence records for Planta.
Note that the occurrence data are not exhaustive, and it is possible for this species to occur in regions not shown on the map.

Database coverage of species in genus Planta

Flag 5.2C: The reference data offers little support for species in this genus
Reasoning: ≤10% of taxon have reference sequence(s) at the given locus

/ (%) of sequence records were found in the reference database for:

Species in the genus Planta
At the target locus rbcL

Number of GenBank records at locus rbcL

Database coverage of species in genus Planta that occur in country of origin Indonesia

Flag 5.3C: It’s unlikely that the true taxonomic identity is another species in this genus, because no others have been recorded in the sample’s country of origin
Reasoning: No species in genus have been observed in the country of origin

/ (%) of sequence records were found in the reference database for:

Species in the genus Planta
At the target locus rbcL
In the sample country of origin Indonesia

Number of GenBank records at locus rbcL

Taxa of interest detected?	True
Flag 2A: Taxon of interest detected in candidate species Flag 5.1A: The given locus for this taxon is well represented in reference database (>5 entries) Flag 5.2B: 10-90% of related taxa have reference sequence(s) at the given locus

Sample details

Locus	rbcL
Preliminary ID	Planta
Taxa of interest	Nicotiana tabacum
Country	Indonesia
Host	NA
Sample ID	MP23-0431_rbcL
Query DNA sequence

Analyst evaluation

Identification of candidate species

Flag 1C: The analyst should attempt subjective species identification at the genus level
>3 candidate species matched with high stringency (identity ≥ 98.5%)

Candidate hits must meet ONE of these criteria:

Minimum alignment length	`400bp`
Minimum query coverage	`85.0%`

Candidate hits have then been classified as follows:

Classification	Alignment identity	Number of hits	Number of species
STRONG MATCH	≥ 98.5%	499	197
MODERATE MATCH	≥ 93.5%	NA	NA
NO MATCH	< 93.5%

Candidate species

Species	Hits	Identity	Database coverage
Nicotiana sylvestris	2	99.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana sylvestris This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana knightiana	1	99.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana knightiana This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana tabacum	13	99.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana tabacum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana paniculata	1	99.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana paniculata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana rustica	1	99.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana rustica This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana glauca	2	99.6%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana glauca This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana attenuata	3	99.6%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana attenuata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana suaveolens	1	99.5%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana suaveolens This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana amplexicaulis	1	99.5%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana amplexicaulis This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana benthamiana	1	99.5%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana benthamiana This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Anthocercis viscosa	1	99.5%	Database coverage of Candidate Anthocercis viscosa This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana debneyi	2	99.5%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana debneyi This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Plastid transformation vector pLEV IR-coS	1	99.5%	Database coverage of Candidate Plastid transformation vector pLEV IR-coS This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Trompettia cardenasiana	1	99.4%	Database coverage of Candidate Trompettia cardenasiana This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana acuminata	1	99.4%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana acuminata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Atropa belladonna	5	99.4%	Database coverage of Candidate Atropa belladonna This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Cuscuta compacta	1	99.4%	Database coverage of Candidate Cuscuta compacta This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Mandragora officinarum	3	99.4%	Database coverage of Candidate Mandragora officinarum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Mandragora turcomanica	1	99.4%	Database coverage of Candidate Mandragora turcomanica This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana plumbaginifolia	1	99.4%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana plumbaginifolia This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana obtusifolia	1	99.4%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana obtusifolia This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Scopolia carniolica	2	99.4%	Database coverage of Candidate Scopolia carniolica This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum sisymbriifolium	3	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum sisymbriifolium This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
synthetic construct	1	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate synthetic construct This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Scopolia parviflora	1	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Scopolia parviflora This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Lycianthes radiata	1	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Lycianthes radiata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana undulata	1	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana undulata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana tomentosiformis	3	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana tomentosiformis This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Anisodus luridus	1	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Anisodus luridus This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Mandragora autumnalis	1	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Mandragora autumnalis This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Hyoscyamus niger	2	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Hyoscyamus niger This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physochlaina physaloides	1	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Physochlaina physaloides This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physochlaina orientalis	1	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Physochlaina orientalis This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solandra grandiflora	1	99.3%	Database coverage of Candidate Solandra grandiflora This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum etuberosum	4	99.2%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum etuberosum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Datura stramonium	9	99.2%	Database coverage of Candidate Datura stramonium This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Przewalskia tangutica	3	99.2%	Database coverage of Candidate Przewalskia tangutica This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicandra physalodes	2	99.2%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicandra physalodes This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanaceae sp. YYL-2022	1	99.2%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanaceae sp. YYL-2022 This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Hyoscyamus muticus	1	99.2%	Database coverage of Candidate Hyoscyamus muticus This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum palustre	1	99.2%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum palustre This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum anomalostemon	1	99.2%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum anomalostemon This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Mandragora caulescens	1	99.2%	Database coverage of Candidate Mandragora caulescens This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana repanda	1	99.1%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana repanda This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum rostratum	2	99.1%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum rostratum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Anisodus tanguticus	1	99.1%	Database coverage of Candidate Anisodus tanguticus This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Datura metel	3	99.1%	Database coverage of Candidate Datura metel This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana stocktonii	1	99.1%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana stocktonii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum sogarandinum	2	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum sogarandinum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Eriolarynx australis	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Eriolarynx australis This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum pennellii	4	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum pennellii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Iochroma ellipticum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Iochroma ellipticum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Eriolarynx lorentzii	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Eriolarynx lorentzii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Withania sp.	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Withania sp. This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Iochroma lehmannii	2	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Iochroma lehmannii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum neorickii	2	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum neorickii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Withania adpressa	2	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Withania adpressa This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Iochroma umbellatum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Iochroma umbellatum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum huaylasense	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum huaylasense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Saracha punctata	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Saracha punctata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum corneliomulleri	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum corneliomulleri This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum peruvianum	2	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum peruvianum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum chilense	2	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum chilense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum triflorum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum triflorum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Withania riebeckii	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Withania riebeckii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Withania coagulans	3	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Withania coagulans This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Iochroma cyaneum	2	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Iochroma cyaneum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Iochroma tingoanum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Iochroma tingoanum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Acnistus arborescens x Iochroma cyaneum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Acnistus arborescens x Iochroma cyaneum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Iochroma nitidum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Iochroma nitidum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nolana spathulata	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Nolana spathulata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Eriolarynx fasciculata	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Eriolarynx fasciculata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana otophora	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana otophora This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum lycopersicoides	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum lycopersicoides This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Saracha nigribaccata	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Saracha nigribaccata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum arcanum	2	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum arcanum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Iochroma salpoanum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Iochroma salpoanum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Anisodus acutangulus	2	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Anisodus acutangulus This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum aligerum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum aligerum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Dunalia obovata	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Dunalia obovata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum chmielewskii	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum chmielewskii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum anamatophilum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum anamatophilum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Iochroma stenanthum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Iochroma stenanthum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum habrochaites	5	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum habrochaites This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Atropanthe sinensis	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Atropanthe sinensis This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum sitiens	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum sitiens This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum nitidum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum nitidum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Iochroma loxense	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Iochroma loxense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Acnistus arborescens	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Acnistus arborescens This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Trozelia umbellata	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Trozelia umbellata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Discopodium penninervium	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Discopodium penninervium This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Withania somnifera	4	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Withania somnifera This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nolana albescens	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Nolana albescens This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Lycium pallidum	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Lycium pallidum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Vassobia dichotoma	1	99.0%	Database coverage of Candidate Vassobia dichotoma This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum medians	10	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum medians This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum canasense	9	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum canasense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum x curtilobum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum x curtilobum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum morelliforme	2	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum morelliforme This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Jaltomata sinuosa	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Jaltomata sinuosa This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum bulbocastanum	7	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum bulbocastanum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum andreanum	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum andreanum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum berthaultii	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum berthaultii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum phureja	5	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum phureja This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum stenotomum	4	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum stenotomum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum tuberosum	12	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum tuberosum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum wittmackii	2	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum wittmackii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum boliviense	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum boliviense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum chomatophilum	11	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum chomatophilum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum multiinterruptum	9	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum multiinterruptum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum albornozii	2	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum albornozii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum acroglossum	2	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum acroglossum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum marinasense	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum marinasense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum bukasovii	15	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum bukasovii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum cajamarquense	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum cajamarquense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum cardiophyllum	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum cardiophyllum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum ambosinum	5	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum ambosinum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum megistacrolobum	5	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum megistacrolobum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum raphanifolium	8	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum raphanifolium This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum chiquidenum	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum chiquidenum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum piurae	2	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum piurae This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum jamesii	4	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum jamesii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum candolleanum	11	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum candolleanum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum paucissectum	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum paucissectum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum tarnii x Solanum tuberosum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum tarnii x Solanum tuberosum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum x juzepczukii	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum x juzepczukii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum aculeatissimum	2	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum aculeatissimum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum trifidum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum trifidum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum pinnatisectum	4	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum pinnatisectum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Schraderanthus viscosus	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Schraderanthus viscosus This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum limbaniense	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum limbaniense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum lignicaule	4	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum lignicaule This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum leptophyes	5	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum leptophyes This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum ehrenbergii	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum ehrenbergii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Lycium ferocissimum	4	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Lycium ferocissimum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis virginiana	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis virginiana This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum stenophyllidium	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum stenophyllidium This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum acaule	5	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum acaule This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum achacachense	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum achacachense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum x blanco-galdosii	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum x blanco-galdosii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum stipuloideum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum stipuloideum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum hypacrarthrum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum hypacrarthrum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum tacnaense	2	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum tacnaense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Oryctes nevadensis	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Oryctes nevadensis This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum huancabambense	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum huancabambense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum abancayense	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum abancayense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Dunalia brachyacantha	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Dunalia brachyacantha This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum trisectum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum trisectum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum humectophilum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum humectophilum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Withania frutescens	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Withania frutescens This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum tarapatanum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum tarapatanum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum ahanhuiri	2	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum ahanhuiri This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum augustii	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum augustii This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum gracilifrons	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum gracilifrons This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum infundibuliforme	2	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum infundibuliforme This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum acroscopicum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum acroscopicum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum dolichocremastrum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum dolichocremastrum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis peruviana	3	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis peruviana This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum pachyandrum	1	98.8%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum pachyandrum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum lycopersicum	48	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum lycopersicum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum polyadenium	3	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum polyadenium This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis philadelphica	2	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis philadelphica This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum ochranthum	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum ochranthum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum gourlayi	7	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum gourlayi This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Nicotiana sp. SH-2010	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Nicotiana sp. SH-2010 This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis cordata	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis cordata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum pimpinellifolium	7	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum pimpinellifolium This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum capsicoides	2	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum capsicoides This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum sparsipilum	5	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum sparsipilum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum brevicaule	12	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum brevicaule This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum salicifolium	2	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum salicifolium This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum cantense	2	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum cantense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum paposanum	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum paposanum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum brachyantherum	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum brachyantherum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum incamayoense	5	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum incamayoense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum tweedianum	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum tweedianum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis ixocarpa	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis ixocarpa This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum virginianum	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum virginianum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum annuum	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum annuum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum lesteri	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum lesteri This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum salamancae	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum salamancae This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Salpiglossis sinuata	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Salpiglossis sinuata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Jaltomata bicolor	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Jaltomata bicolor This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis minima	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis minima This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis pruinosa	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis pruinosa This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum remyanum	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum remyanum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum galapagense	2	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum galapagense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum aureum	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum aureum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum mochiquense	2	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum mochiquense This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis ampla	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis ampla This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis angulata	3	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis angulata This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis sp. SH-2010	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis sp. SH-2010 This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum cheesmaniae	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum cheesmaniae This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Physalis longifolia	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Physalis longifolia This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Brugmansia arborea	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Brugmansia arborea This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum sanchez-vegae	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum sanchez-vegae This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.
Solanum microdontum	1	98.7%	Database coverage of Candidate Solanum microdontum This Candidate has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error). For example, if your sample is from Homo sapiens, but there are no Homo sapiens DNA records in the reference database, the analysis will be unable to detect Homo sapiens as the correct taxonomic identity. In the latter case, the analysis will most likely try to assign the closest relative with existing reference data as the taxonomic identity. No database coverage information is available for this taxon. This is because database coverage is not evaluated when there are zero or >3 candidate species.

#	Accession	Hit subject	Align length	Query coverage	Bitscore	E-value	Identity
1	KM025249	Nicotiana sylvestris ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
2	BK010737	TPA_asm: Nicotiana knightiana chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
3	AP019624	Nicotiana tabacum apxA_T2_120719 chloroplast DNA, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
4	OQ473890	Nicotiana tabacum isolate PilotoCubano chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
5	AP019623	Nicotiana tabacum SR1_120719 chloroplast DNA, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
6	MZ707522	Nicotiana tabacum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
7	KU199713	Nicotiana tabacum cultivar TN90 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
8	NC_007500	Nicotiana sylvestris chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
9	NC_001879	Nicotiana tabacum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
10	OQ473888	Nicotiana tabacum isolate Hainan2 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
11	OQ473889	Nicotiana tabacum isolate Hainan3 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
12	AP019625	Nicotiana tabacum apxC_T2_120719 chloroplast DNA, large circle chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
13	BK010741	TPA_asm: Nicotiana paniculata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
14	OQ473886	Nicotiana tabacum isolate 7-CX14 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
15	OQ473887	Nicotiana tabacum isolate 189802E-Habana2000 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
16	BK010738	TPA_asm: Nicotiana rustica chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1873.73	0.00e+00	99.7%
17	NC_056979	Nicotiana glauca chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1865.8	0.00e+00	99.6%
18	MG182422	Nicotiana attenuata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1865.8	0.00e+00	99.6%
19	JF419563	Nicotiana attenuata ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) mRNA, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1865.8	0.00e+00	99.6%
20	NC_035952	Nicotiana attenuata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1865.8	0.00e+00	99.6%
21	BK010740	TPA_asm: Nicotiana glauca chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1865.8	0.00e+00	99.6%
22	NC_056978	Nicotiana suaveolens chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1857.87	0.00e+00	99.5%
23	NC_056976	Nicotiana amplexicaulis chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1857.87	0.00e+00	99.5%
24	LT576836	Nicotiana tabacum chloroplast rbcL gene for Rubisco large subunit, cultivar Petit-Havana	955	100.0%	1857.87	0.00e+00	99.5%
25	LC617401	Nicotiana benthamiana NbWT_20_0_01 chloroplast rbcL gene for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, complete cds	955	100.0%	1857.87	0.00e+00	99.5%
26	U08608	Anthocercis viscosa chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds	955	100.0%	1857.87	0.00e+00	99.5%
27	J01450	Nicotiana tabacum coupling factor beta-subunit gene, partial cds; and ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase large subunit gene, complete cds; chloroplast genes for chloroplast products	955	100.0%	1857.87	0.00e+00	99.5%
28	NC_056977	Nicotiana debneyi chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1857.87	0.00e+00	99.5%
29	MT596796	Plastid transformation vector pLEV IR-coS, complete sequence	953	99.8%	1853.91	0.00e+00	99.5%
30	D70815	Nicotiana debneyi chloroplast rbcL gene for ribulose -1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit, complete cds	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
31	NC_029746	Iochroma cardenasianum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
32	M16896	Tobacco (N.acuminata) ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
33	KM360660	Atropa belladonna ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; plastid	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
34	NC_004561	Atropa belladonna chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
35	AY558863	Cuscuta compacta ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
36	PV078024	Mandragora officinarum voucher personal collection:JeremyBechelli:04-SSU chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
37	U08609	Atropa belladonna chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
38	PV078023	Mandragora turcomanica voucher personal collection:JeremyBechelli:06-SSU chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
39	LC649170	Nicotiana plumbaginifolia YN25 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1849.94	0.00e+00	99.4%
40	BK010739	TPA_asm: Nicotiana obtusifolia chloroplast, complete genome	952	99.7%	1844.0	0.00e+00	99.4%
41	HQ216145	Scopolia carniolica isolate Tu210 ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; and rbcL-accD intergenic spacer, partial sequence; plastid	929	97.3%	1798.4	0.00e+00	99.4%
42	MH703713	Mandragora officinarum isolate Jordan ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; plastid	929	97.3%	1798.4	0.00e+00	99.4%
43	HQ216117	Atropa belladonna isolate Tu169 ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; and rbcL-accD intergenic spacer, partial sequence; plastid	929	97.3%	1798.4	0.00e+00	99.4%
44	FJ914178	Atropa belladonna voucher H.Sun 9040 ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast	929	97.3%	1798.4	0.00e+00	99.4%
45	MN218090	Solanum sisymbriifolium isolate NN15 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
46	JN563930	Synthetic construct Nicotiana undulata chloroplast clone pCK2-6, complete sequence	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
47	MZ221862	Solanum sisymbriifolium voucher E:Sarkinen et al. 4536 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
48	NC_030282	Scopolia parviflora chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
49	NC_062492	Lycianthes radiata voucher E:Gonzales 2039 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
50	U08614	Mandragora officinalis chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
51	NC_016068	Nicotiana undulata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
52	XM_033661133	PREDICTED: Nicotiana tomentosiformis ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain (LOC117281257), mRNA	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
53	MW470952	Anisodus luridus chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
54	PV078025	Mandragora autumnalis voucher personal collection:JeremyBechelli:03-SSU chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
55	NC_007602	Nicotiana tomentosiformis chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
56	MH360735	Hyoscyamus niger ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
57	NC_061213	Solanum sisymbriifolium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
58	NC_024261	Hyoscyamus niger chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1842.01	0.00e+00	99.3%
59	MN262642	Physochlaina physaloides chloroplast, complete genome	954	99.9%	1840.03	0.00e+00	99.3%
60	NC_044154	Physochlaina orientalis chloroplast, complete genome	954	99.9%	1840.03	0.00e+00	99.3%
61	U08620	Solandra grandiflora chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds	952	99.7%	1836.07	0.00e+00	99.3%
62	NC_041604	Solanum etuberosum voucher PI 498311 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
63	NC_063110	Scopolia carniolica chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
64	KM025251	Nicotiana tomentosiformis ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
65	U08611	Datura stramonium chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
66	MW324578	Przewalskia tangutica chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
67	MN165114	Nicandra physalodes chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
68	MZ221881	Solanum etuberosum voucher E:Gardner et al. 111 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
69	MW042817	Solanaceae sp. YYL-2022 cultivar Henan chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
70	PP234564	Przewalskia tangutica isolate p53 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
71	MZ450974	Hyoscyamus muticus chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
72	NC_036733	Przewalskia tangutica chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
73	NC_041622	Solanum palustre voucher PI 245763 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
74	U08615	Nicandra physalodes chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
75	ON509842	Solanum etuberosum voucher PI 558288 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
76	OM638061	Solanum etuberosum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
77	NC_062874	Solanum anomalostemon voucher BM:Knapp 10364 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
78	NC_086882	Mandragora caulescens chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1834.09	0.00e+00	99.2%
79	MT610897	Datura stramonium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
80	NC_056981	Nicotiana repanda chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
81	KT178123	Solanum rostratum voucher Aust 178 ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; plastid	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
82	NC_018117	Datura stramonium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
83	MK347419	Anisodus tanguticus chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
84	MK244356	Datura stramonium voucher QRI 540 ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
85	OK040953	Datura metel chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
86	NC_057245	Solanum rostratum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
87	NC_056980	Nicotiana stocktonii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
88	MT610896	Datura stramonium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
89	OM616889	Datura stramonium isolate MSH-DS19 ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
90	JN662489	Datura stramonium isolate NN003 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1826.16	0.00e+00	99.1%
91	HM849947	Datura stramonium ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast	940	98.4%	1804.35	0.00e+00	99.1%
92	KF022464	Datura stramonium isolate 01 ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; plastid	938	98.2%	1800.39	0.00e+00	99.1%
93	MH021551	Solanum sogarandinum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
94	NC_029833	Iochroma australe chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
95	KX086685	Solanum pennellii isolate TGRC LA1272 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
96	NC_030177	Iochroma ellipticum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
97	MN990084	Solanum pennellii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
98	OR400641	Eriolarynx lorentzii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
99	OR426647	Withania sp. chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
100	KU310654	Iochroma lehmannii plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
101	NC_026880	Solanum neorickii isolate TS-146 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
102	MG946933	Withania adpressa ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
103	NC_030044	Iochroma umbellatum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
104	NC_062081	Solanum huaylasense chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
105	NC_026694	Saracha punctata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
106	NC_062080	Solanum corneliomuelleri chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
107	NC_026881	Solanum peruvianum isolate TS-404 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
108	NC_026877	Solanum chilense isolate TS-408 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
109	KT178124	Solanum triflorum voucher Aust 161 ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; plastid	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
110	LC487531	Datura metel chloroplast rbcL gene, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit, partial sequence	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
111	BK010849	TPA_asm: Withania riebeckii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
112	NC_069556	Datura metel chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
113	MT811797	Solanum neorickii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
114	MG946934	Withania coagulans ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
115	NC_030178	Iochroma cyaneum voucher Smith 265 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
116	NC_027177	Iochroma tingoanum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
117	NC_030056	Acnistus arborescens x Iochroma cyaneum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
118	NC_026567	Iochroma nitidum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
119	U08616	Nolana spathulata chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
120	NC_030167	Iochroma lehmannii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
121	NC_035742	Solanum pennellii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
122	NC_030171	Eriolarynx fasciculata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
123	M16867	Tobacco (N.otophora) ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
124	KX086691	Solanum lycopersicoides isolate TGRC LA2951 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
125	BK010847	TPA_asm: Withania adpressa chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
126	MG946935	Withania coagulans ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
127	NC_027099	Dunalia solanacea chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
128	KX086696	Solanum arcanum isolate TGRC LA2153 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
129	NC_030168	Iochroma salpoanum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
130	HG975452	Solanum pennellii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
131	NC_066481	Anisodus acutangulus chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
132	NC_062867	Solanum aligerum voucher BM:Knapp et al. 10436 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
133	NC_026563	Dunalia obovata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
134	OQ473544	Solanum chilense chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
135	NC_062079	Solanum chmielewskii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
136	NC_086523	Solanum anamatophilum voucher CIP 761555 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
137	NC_026574	Iochroma stenanthum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
138	OQ473540	Solanum habrochaites chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
139	NC_044471	Atropanthe sinensis chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
140	KX086690	Solanum sitiens isolate TGRC LA4115 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
141	NC_062486	Solanum nitidum voucher E:Sarkinen et al. 4851 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
142	NC_026726	Iochroma loxense chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
143	NC_062078	Solanum arcanum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
144	NC_030185	Acnistus arborescens chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
145	MN781973	Anisodus acutangulus chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
146	OR360843	Trozelia umbellata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
147	OR400640	Discopodium penninervium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
148	NC_047176	Withania coagulans chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
149	MK142783	Withania somnifera chloroplast clone 154386, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
150	KU306396	Iochroma cyaneum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1818.23	0.00e+00	99.0%
151	AB051021	Nolana albescens chloroplast rbcL gene for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, partial cds	953	99.8%	1814.26	0.00e+00	99.0%
152	AB051025	Lycium pallidum chloroplast rbcL gene for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate cerboxylase/oxygenase, partial cds	953	99.8%	1814.26	0.00e+00	99.0%
153	KP294521	Vassobia dichotoma chloroplast, complete genome	952	99.7%	1812.28	0.00e+00	99.0%
154	MZ221921	Solanum medians voucher E:Gonzales et al. 9 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
155	MH021451	Solanum canasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
156	ON509847	Solanum x curtilobum voucher PI 604207 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
157	NC_086548	Solanum morelliforme voucher CIP 764271 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
158	NC_062863	Jaltomata sinuosa chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
159	OM638073	Solanum bulbocastanum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
160	MH021410	Solanum andreanum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
161	ON509711	Solanum berthaultii voucher CIP 760257 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
162	MH021545	Solanum phureja plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
163	NC_041607	Solanum stenotomum voucher PI 320364 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
164	OM638079	Solanum tuberosum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
165	NC_086524	Solanum wittmackii voucher CIP 762077 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
166	ON509750	Solanum medians voucher CIP 761503 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
167	NC_062870	Solanum boliviense voucher CORD:Barboza et al. 3562 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
168	NC_041603	Solanum chomatophilum voucher PI 365328 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
169	OR632701	Solanum tuberosum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
170	NC_041620	Solanum multiinterruptum voucher PI 210044 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
171	ON509811	Solanum albornozii voucher CIP 763735 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
172	MH021401	Solanum acroglossum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
173	MH021510	Solanum marinasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
174	NC_041625	Solanum phureja voucher PI 195191 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
175	MH021530	Solanum multiinterruptum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
176	MH021431	Solanum bukasovii plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
177	OM638058	Solanum cajamarquense chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
178	MH021434	Solanum bukasovii plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
179	MT120860	Solanum bukasovii isolate BUK1 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
180	NC_041621	Solanum bukasovii f. multidissectum voucher PI 210052 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
181	MK690622	Solanum cardiophyllum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
182	MH021432	Solanum bukasovii plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
183	ON509782	Solanum multiinterruptum voucher CIP 762407 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
184	MH021449	Solanum canasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
185	NC_041590	Solanum albornozii voucher PI 498206 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
186	NC_041591	Solanum ambosinum voucher PI 365317 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
187	MH021518	Solanum megistacrolobum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
188	ON509767	Solanum chomatophilum voucher CIP 762055 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
189	OM638069	Solanum raphanifolium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
190	MH021437	Solanum bukasovii plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
191	ON509766	Solanum chiquidenum voucher CIP 762052 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
192	NC_069602	Solanum piurae chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
193	NC_041613	Solanum jamesii voucher PI 641944 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
194	OM302453	Solanum candolleanum voucher SC4-1 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
195	ON509807	Solanum candolleanum voucher CIP 763651 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
196	OM638067	Solanum paucissectum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
197	NC_041588	Solanum acroglossum voucher PI 365313 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
198	NC_069604	Solanum tarnii x Solanum tuberosum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
199	OM638055	Solanum bukasovii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
200	NC_050208	Solanum x juzepczukii isolate JUZ chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
201	PP234974	Solanum aculeatissimum voucher LXP-13-07963 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
202	ON509697	Solanum tuberosum voucher CIP 703514 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
203	MH021448	Solanum canasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
204	ON509795	Solanum chomatophilum voucher CIP 762615 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
205	NC_086545	Solanum trifidum voucher CIP 764145 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
206	NC_041599	Solanum cajamarquense voucher PI 230522 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
207	NC_050207	Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigenum isolate ADG1 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
208	ON509824	Solanum morelliforme voucher CIP 764293 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
209	MH021566	Solanum stenotomum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
210	ON509775	Solanum medians voucher CIP 762256 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
211	NC_041626	Solanum pinnatisectum voucher PI 253214 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
212	OR360844	Schraderanthus viscosus chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
213	MH021519	Solanum megistacrolobum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
214	MH021438	Solanum bulbocastanum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
215	NC_041617	Solanum limbaniense voucher PI 473468 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
216	OM638066	Solanum megistacrolobum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
217	ON509754	Solanum lignicaule voucher CIP 761652 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
218	ON509751	Solanum candolleanum voucher CIP 761510 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
219	ON509685	Solanum tuberosum voucher CIP 703308 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
220	MH021435	Solanum bukasovii plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
221	ON509763	Solanum bulbocastanum voucher CIP 761933 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
222	ON509691	Solanum tuberosum voucher CIP 703433 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
223	MH021506	Solanum leptophyes plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
224	ON509757	Solanum candolleanum voucher CIP 761739 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
225	MH021447	Solanum canasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
226	ON509768	Solanum candolleanum voucher CIP 762068 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
227	NC_069597	Solanum chiquidenum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
228	NC_086550	Solanum ehrenbergii voucher PI 275216 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
229	XM_059432982	PREDICTED: Lycium ferocissimum ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain (LOC132042439), mRNA	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
230	ON509791	Solanum cajamarquense voucher CIP 762608 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
231	KT178121	Physalis virginiana voucher Aust 157 ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; plastid	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
232	MH021433	Solanum bukasovii plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
233	ON509770	Solanum wittmackii voucher CIP 762093 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
234	NC_041596	Solanum stenophyllidium voucher PI 320265 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
235	ON509792	Solanum chomatophilum voucher CIP 762611 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
236	ON509779	Solanum acaule voucher CIP 762345 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
237	ON509790	Solanum chomatophilum voucher CIP 762576 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
238	OM638050	Solanum acaule chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
239	NC_041587	Solanum achacachense voucher PI 558032 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
240	OP056022	Solanum tuberosum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
241	OM638070	Solanum raphanifolium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
242	ON509724	Solanum medians voucher CIP 760415 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
243	ON509759	Solanum candolleanum voucher CIP 761827 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
244	NC_041595	Solanum x blanco-galdosii voucher PI 498214 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
245	KX086697	Solanum habrochaites isolate TGRC LA2196 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
246	NC_041619	Solanum megistacrolobum voucher PI 210034 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
247	MH021408	Solanum ambosinum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
248	MT120867	Solanum bukasovii isolate BUK2 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
249	NC_068253	Solanum raphanifolium voucher SR1 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
250	NC_041610	Solanum marinasense voucher PI 498255 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
251	ON509802	Solanum stipuloideum voucher CIP 763111 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
252	ON509720	Solanum candolleanum voucher CIP 760337 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
253	MH021526	Solanum multiinterruptum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
254	NC_062506	Solanum candolleanum voucher BM:Knapp et al. 10251 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
255	MH021442	Solanum canasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
256	MH021443	Solanum canasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
257	ON509849	Solanum tuberosum voucher PI 607886 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
258	ON509704	Solanum chomatophilum voucher CIP 760056 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
259	ON509774	Solanum medians voucher CIP 762218 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
260	MH021446	Solanum canasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
261	MH021570	Solanum stenotomum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
262	NC_041611	Solanum hypacrarthrum voucher PI 473477 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
263	MH021543	Solanum phureja plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
264	MT120862	Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigenum isolate ADG2 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
265	NC_041551	Solanum acaule chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
266	OM638082	Solanum tacnaense chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
267	ON509844	Solanum x juzepczukii voucher PI 599259 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
268	OR360845	Oryctes nevadensis chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
269	XM_059436179	PREDICTED: Lycium ferocissimum ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain (LOC132045594), mRNA	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
270	MH021404	Solanum ambosinum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
271	NC_086521	Solanum huancabambense voucher CIP 760955 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
272	ON509839	Solanum tuberosum voucher PI 546023 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
273	NC_041586	Solanum abancayense voucher PI 458403 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
274	MH021541	Solanum phureja plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
275	NC_026879	Solanum habrochaites isolate TS-407 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
276	ON509771	Solanum multiinterruptum voucher CIP 762103 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
277	OQ473543	Solanum habrochaites chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
278	OM638052	Solanum acaule chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
279	NC_026906	Dunalia brachyacantha chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
280	MZ233590	Solanum pinnatisectum voucher SP-10 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
281	NC_061388	Solanum aculeatissimum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
282	MH021493	Solanum jamesii plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
283	MH021539	Solanum phureja plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
284	MH021527	Solanum multiinterruptum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
285	ON509752	Solanum chomatophilum voucher CIP 761551 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
286	ON509834	Solanum jamesii voucher PI 458424 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
287	ON509740	Solanum chiquidenum voucher CIP 761069 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
288	NC_062469	Solanum trisectum voucher HFN:974750147 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
289	ON509793	Solanum chomatophilum voucher CIP 762613 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
290	ON509760	Solanum candolleanum voucher CIP 761843 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
291	OM638051	Solanum acaule chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
292	NC_062502	Solanum humectophilum voucher E:Sarkinen et al. 4625 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
293	ON509749	Solanum multiinterruptum voucher CIP 761424 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
294	MG946936	Withania frutescens ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
295	NC_069607	Solanum tarapatanum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
296	NC_041598	Solanum bukasovii voucher PI 266385 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
297	ON509713	Solanum boliviense voucher CIP 760279 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
298	ON509755	Solanum raphanifolium voucher CIP 761655 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
299	ON509829	Solanum raphanifolium voucher PI 296126 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
300	ON509748	Solanum boliviense voucher CIP 761384 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
301	MH021547	Solanum pinnatisectum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
302	NC_041600	Solanum canasense voucher PI 210035 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
303	MH021525	Solanum multiinterruptum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
304	ON509781	Solanum raphanifolium voucher CIP 762358 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
305	NC_007943	Solanum bulbocastanum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
306	MH021520	Solanum megistacrolobum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
307	ON509741	Solanum piurae voucher CIP 761072 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
308	NC_050205	Solanum ahanhuiri isolate AJH chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
309	NC_086525	Solanum augustii voucher CIP 762633 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
310	ON509794	Solanum chomatophilum voucher CIP 762614 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
311	MN866909	Lycium ferocissimum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
312	ON509843	Solanum x juzepczukii voucher PI 595438 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
313	MH021406	Solanum ambosinum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
314	ON509764	Solanum candolleanum voucher CIP 762001 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
315	ON509705	Solanum chomatophilum voucher CIP 760057 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
316	MH021411	Solanum andreanum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
317	NC_069599	Solanum gracilifrons chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
318	NC_041592	Solanum andreanum voucher PI 320345 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
319	OQ473541	Solanum peruvianum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
320	NC_069600	Solanum infundibuliforme chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
321	ON509805	Solanum multiinterruptum voucher CIP 763491 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
322	ON509700	Solanum ahanhuiri voucher CIP 706209 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
323	MH021569	Solanum stenophyllidium plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
324	OM638075	Solanum pinnatisectum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
325	ON509722	Solanum raphanifolium voucher CIP 760351 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
326	MH021461	Solanum chomatophilum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
327	NC_041589	Solanum acroscopicum voucher PI 365314 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
328	MT984233	Solanum habrochaites chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
329	MH021567	Solanum stenotomum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
330	MH021407	Solanum ambosinum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
331	ON509756	Solanum raphanifolium voucher CIP 761683 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
332	MH021421	Solanum stenophyllidium plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
333	MH021505	Solanum leptophyes plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
334	NC_069606	Solanum tacnaense chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
335	NC_086526	Solanum dolichocremastrum voucher CIP 762998 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
336	MK690624	Solanum jamesii chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
337	ON509690	Solanum tuberosum voucher CIP 703421 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
338	MH021524	Solanum bukasovii f. multidissectum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1810.3	0.00e+00	98.8%
339	AM235152	Lycium ferocissimum chloroplast partial rbcL gene for ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large subunit, specimen voucher Balele K. 5 (NBG)	954	99.9%	1808.32	0.00e+00	98.8%
340	OP028208	Physalis peruviana chloroplast, complete genome	952	99.7%	1804.35	0.00e+00	98.8%
341	NC_026570	Physalis peruviana plastid, complete genome	952	99.7%	1804.35	0.00e+00	98.8%
342	NC_062488	Solanum pachyandrum voucher BM:Sarkinen et al. 4546 chloroplast, complete genome	952	99.7%	1804.35	0.00e+00	98.8%
343	KY887588	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
344	OQ473547	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
345	MH021549	Solanum polyadenium plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
346	NC_070364	Physalis philadelphica chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
347	KX086688	Solanum ochranthum isolate TGRC LA2161 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
348	OQ473536	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
349	MH021473	Solanum gourlayi plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
350	AB586586	Nicotiana sp. SH-2010 chloroplast gene for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit, partial cds, isolate: T077	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
351	NC_072167	Physalis cordata chloroplast, complete sequence	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
352	NC_041618	Solanum medians voucher PI 210045 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
353	LC613092	Solanum lycopersicum CMS[P] chloroplast DNA, contig: CMS-PCp054, partial sequence	955	100.0%	3604.74	0.00e+00	98.7%
354	ON509733	Solanum polyadenium voucher CIP 760726 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
355	NC_026882	Solanum pimpinellifolium isolate TS-415 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
356	ON203960	Solanum capsicoides chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
357	MH021554	Solanum sparsipilum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
358	OQ473538	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
359	ON509717	Solanum brevicaule voucher CIP 760324 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
360	NC_062481	Solanum salicifolium voucher HFN:s.n. chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
361	NC_041628	Solanum sogarandinum voucher PI 230510 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
362	MH021523	Solanum bukasovii f. multidissectum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
363	KX086703	Solanum lycopersicum ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
364	KX086693	Solanum lycopersicum isolate TGRC LA1320 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
365	AC239738	Solanum lycopersicum strain Heinz 1706 chromosome 1 clone hba-240p19 map 1, complete sequence	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
366	MT811791	Solanum lycopersicum cultivar PDS chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
367	OQ473542	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
368	OQ473549	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
369	ON509718	Solanum brevicaule voucher CIP 760327 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
370	NC_062511	Solanum cantense voucher BM:Sarkinen et al. 4079 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
371	OQ473532	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
372	LC613093	Solanum lycopersicum CMS[P] chloroplast DNA, contig: CMS-PCp055, partial sequence	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
373	NC_062489	Solanum paposanum voucher BM:Sarkinen et al. 4091 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
374	NC_062871	Solanum brachyantherum voucher E:Baines et al. 56 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
375	OR166175	Withania somnifera chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
376	MH021514	Solanum medians plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
377	ON509806	Solanum candolleanum voucher CIP 763648 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
378	NC_041629	Solanum sparsipilum voucher PI 246536 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
379	OQ473534	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
380	MH021488	Solanum incamayoense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
381	MH019242	Physalis peruviana chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
382	MT811790	Solanum lycopersicum cultivar Corbarino chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
383	MH021516	Solanum medians plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
384	MH021428	Solanum brevicaule plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
385	MZ221859	Solanum salicifolium voucher BM:Knapp 10492 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
386	MH021478	Solanum gourlayi plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
387	ON509723	Solanum lignicaule voucher CIP 760353 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
388	MH021491	Solanum incamayoense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
389	LC613099	Solanum lycopersicum O chloroplast DNA, contig: OCp002, partial sequence	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
390	NC_062471	Solanum tweedianum voucher CORD:Barboza 2229 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
391	OQ473545	Solanum pimpinellifolium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
392	OQ473527	Solanum pimpinellifolium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
393	KP331414	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
394	MH021489	Solanum incamayoense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
395	ON509761	Solanum bulbocastanum voucher CIP 761896 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
396	ON509708	Solanum brevicaule voucher CIP 760235 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
397	NC_041601	Solanum cardiophyllum voucher PI 283062 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
398	MH021553	Solanum sparsipilum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
399	OQ473533	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
400	OQ473526	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
401	MH021471	Solanum gourlayi plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
402	MG946905	Withania somnifera ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
403	OQ473537	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
404	NC_085278	Physalis ixocarpa chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
405	KX086702	Solanum lycopersicum isolate UIB 1-30 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
406	LC613090	Solanum lycopersicum CMS[MSA1] chloroplast DNA, contig: CMS-MSA1Cp001, partial sequence	955	100.0%	3604.74	0.00e+00	98.7%
407	NC_041624	Solanum paucissectum voucher PI 473489 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
408	MT973500	Solanum pimpinellifolium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
409	MG946897	Solanum virginianum ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit gene, partial cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
410	OQ473529	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
411	MH021513	Solanum medians plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
412	OQ473539	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
413	OQ473521	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
414	NC_062873	Solanum annuum voucher CORD:Barboza 3017 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
415	MH021444	Solanum canasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
416	NC_086547	Solanum lesteri voucher CIP 764266 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
417	MH021427	Solanum brevicaule plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
418	NC_062480	Solanum salamancae voucher CORD:Barboza 2182 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
419	U08618	Salpiglossis sinuata chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
420	MN192191	Physalis philadelphica cultivar Wild chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
421	KX086701	Solanum lycopersicum isolate UIB 1-48 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
422	NC_062508	Solanum capsicoides voucher E:Sarkinen et al. 4547 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
423	ON509826	Solanum medians voucher PI 265872 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
424	NC_007898	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
425	NC_062862	Jaltomata bicolor voucher E:Gonzales 2880 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
426	MH021529	Solanum bukasovii f. multidissectum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
427	LC613091	Solanum lycopersicum CMS[O] chloroplast DNA, contig: CMS-OCp001, partial sequence	955	100.0%	3604.74	0.00e+00	98.7%
428	MH021454	Solanum cardiophyllum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
429	PP471919	Physalis minima isolate R2 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
430	NC_039458	Physalis pruinosa chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
431	ON509747	Solanum lignicaule voucher CIP 761212 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
432	HG975525	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
433	ON509836	Solanum brevicaule voucher PI 473065 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
434	OQ473530	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
435	OM638077	Solanum sparsipilum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
436	NC_062477	Solanum remyanum voucher E:Baines et al. 115 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
437	ON509830	Solanum infundibuliforme voucher PI 458324 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
438	LC613098	Solanum lycopersicum O chloroplast DNA, contig: OCp001, partial sequence	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
439	NC_041627	Solanum polyadenium voucher PI 161728 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
440	LC613095	Solanum pimpinellifolium LA1670 chloroplast DNA, contig: LA1670Cp001, partial sequence	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
441	KX086699	Solanum galapagense isolate TGRC LA0930 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
442	MH021490	Solanum incamayoense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
443	OR166174	Withania somnifera chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
444	ON509719	Solanum brevicaule voucher CIP 760328 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
445	ON509706	Solanum brevicaule voucher CIP 760230 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
446	MT811792	Solanum lycopersicum cultivar Piennolo giallo chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
447	OQ473524	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
448	ON509762	Solanum bulbocastanum voucher CIP 761898 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
449	NC_026878	Solanum galapagense isolate TS-208 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
450	KY887587	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
451	OQ473522	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
452	OQ473528	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
453	ON509772	Solanum cantense voucher CIP 762130 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
454	NC_041616	Solanum leptophyes voucher PI 458378 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
455	LC613103	Solanum lycopersicum Sekai-ichi chloroplast DNA, contig: Sekai-ichiCp001, partial sequence	955	100.0%	3604.74	0.00e+00	98.7%
456	MH021511	Solanum marinasense plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
457	NC_062421	Solanum aureum voucher E:Balls 5826 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
458	MH021470	Solanum gourlayi plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
459	OQ473546	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
460	MH021436	Solanum bukasovii plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
461	ON509799	Solanum mochiquense voucher CIP 762989 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
462	MH021504	Solanum leptophyes plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
463	ON509701	Solanum paucissectum voucher CIP 760007 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
464	NC_062718	Solanum mochiquense voucher SM1-3 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
465	OR296714	Physalis ampla chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
466	MH045574	Physalis angulata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
467	JF772171	Solanum tuberosum isolate RH89-039-16 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
468	AB586587	Physalis sp. SH-2010 chloroplast gene for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit, partial cds, isolate: T964	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
469	KX086692	Solanum pimpinellifolium isolate TGRC LA0114 ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, complete cds; chloroplast	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
470	NC_026876	Solanum cheesmaniae isolate TS-199 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
471	KP117024	Solanum lycopersicum isolate TS-321 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
472	OP748222	Physalis longifolia var. subglabrata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
473	OQ473548	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
474	MH021424	Solanum brevicaule plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
475	MH021507	Solanum leptophyes plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
476	MT811798	Solanum pimpinellifolium chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
477	LC613100	Solanum lycopersicum P chloroplast DNA, contig: PCp001, partial sequence	955	100.0%	3604.74	0.00e+00	98.7%
478	OQ473531	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
479	NC_081500	Brugmansia arborea chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
480	MH021555	Solanum sparsipilum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
481	OQ473525	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
482	NC_069601	Solanum lignicaule chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
483	NC_041606	Solanum gourlayi voucher PI 472911 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
484	MH021426	Solanum brevicaule plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
485	AM087200	Solanum lycopersicum complete chloroplast genome, cultivar IPA-6	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
486	OQ473535	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
487	OM257167	Physalis angulata var. villosa chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
488	MH021423	Solanum brevicaule plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
489	MH021469	Solanum gourlayi plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
490	MH021439	Solanum bulbocastanum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
491	MH021425	Solanum brevicaule plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
492	NC_041612	Solanum incamayoense voucher PI 473060 plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
493	MH021468	Solanum gourlayi plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
494	NC_062482	Solanum sanchez-vegae voucher E:Gonzales 2389 chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
495	OQ473523	Solanum lycopersicum chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
496	MH021590	Solanum microdontum plastid, complete genome	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.7%
497	L14403	Lycopersicon esculentum chloroplast ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds	955	100.0%	1802.37	0.00e+00	98.6%
498	NC_039457	Physalis angulata chloroplast, complete genome	955	100.0%	1800.39	0.00e+00	98.6%
499	LC613096	Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme LA1673 chloroplast DNA, contig: LA1673Cp001, partial sequence	955	100.0%	3573.02	0.00e+00	98.5%
500	LC613102	Solanum acaule chloroplast DNA, contig: SacauleCp001, partial sequence	955	100.0%	3388.67	0.00e+00	97.3%

Selected alignment

Selected taxonomy

Kingdom
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Species

Boxplot of BLAST hit identity percent grouped by genus

The boxplot above shows the distribution of BLAST hits identity within each genus. Each data point shows the alignment identity between the query sequence and reference sequence. The analyst may wish to refer to this figure when making a subjective genus-level identification for the sample.

Analyst evaluation

Taxa of interest (TOI)

This sections shows the taxa of interest (TOI) specified by the sample submitter. Each of these taxa has been cross-referenced against the candidate species to determine if they might match the taxonomic identity of the sample. A blank row indicates a TOI that did not match any candidate species, meaning that it is unlikely that the sample matches that TOI.

Taxon of interest

Match rank

Match taxon

Match species

Match accession

Match identity

Database coverage

Nicotiana tabacum

species

Nicotiana tabacum

AP019624

0.997

This Taxon of Interest has been independently evaluated against the reference database to determine whether sufficient reference data exists to support identification of this taxon. Insufficient coverage can result in that taxon not be correctly identified as the taxonomic identity of the sample (type-II error).

	Coverage of Nicotiana tabacum
	Coverage of species in genus Nicotiana
	Coverage of species in genus Nicotiana in country of origin Indonesia

Database coverage of Nicotiana tabacum

Flag 5.1A: The reference data supports this taxon well
Reasoning: The given locus for this taxon is well represented in reference database (>5 entries)

28 records

There are 28 sequences in the reference database for Nicotiana tabacum at the given locus rbcL.

Global occurrence records for Nicotiana tabacum.
Note that the occurrence data are not exhaustive, and it is possible for this species to occur in regions not shown on the map.

Database coverage of species in genus Nicotiana

Flag 5.2B: The reference data offers some support for species in this genus
Reasoning: 10-90% of related taxa have reference sequence(s) at the given locus

/ (%) of sequence records were found in the reference database for:

Species in the genus Nicotiana
At the target locus rbcL

Number of GenBank records at locus rbcL

Database coverage of species in genus Nicotiana that occur in country of origin Indonesia

Flag 5.3A: The reference data supports species in this genus well, when we evaluate only species that occur in the sample’s country of origin
Reasoning: All species in genus from country of origin have reference sequence(s) for this locus

/ (%) of sequence records were found in the reference database for:

Species in the genus Nicotiana
At the target locus rbcL
In the sample country of origin Indonesia

Number of GenBank records at locus rbcL

Reference sequence source diversity

This analysis evaluates how many independent sources have contributed to reference sequences for each candidate species. This provides a measure of confidence in the taxonomic annotation of references sequences. A sequence that has been annotated by multiple independent sources is more likely to have a correct taxonomic annotation.

Analyst evaluation

No candidate species to report on.

Intraspecies diversity

This section provides a phylogeny of the candidate reference sequences. The analyst can use this to make a subjective observation on how well the reference sequences are able to distinguish between species. If the phylogeny shows distinct clades for each species, we can be confident that the molecular data are capable of distinguishing between those species. However, if the phylogeny shows overlap between species, this reduces the capacity of the molecular data to confidently distinguish between those species. In some cases, we may see the query sequence falling outside of the adjacent species' clades, which indicates that our query species is not represented in the reference database, which could indicate a rare or novel species.

Analyst evaluation

Click + drag to pan
Scroll to zoom in/out

	Vertical space
	Horizontal space

The phylogetic tree was constructed with FastME using the Neighbor-Joining method. Multiple-sequence alignment of the candidate reference sequences was performed using MAFFT. The visualization is rendered with TidyTree.

Taxonomy Check

The following resources can be used to ensure that the given taxonomy is legitimate and current.

Taxa	Database
General	GBIF
General	ITIS
Mealybugs & scale	ScaleNet database
Thrips	Thripswiki
Spider Mites	Spider Mites Database
Psocodea (Barklice, Booklice, and Parasitic Lice)	Psocodea Species File Online
Orthoptera	Orthoptera Species File Online
Drosophilidae	TaxoDros
Diptera	Catalog of the Diptera of the Australasian and Oceanian Regions Systema Dipterorum
Aphids	Aphid Species File
Ants	AntWeb AntCat
Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths)	The Global Lepidoptera Names Index
Gracillariidae (primitive moths)	Global Taxonomic Database of Gracillariidae
Pyralidae (pyralid moths)	Global Information System on Pyraloidea
Tortricidae (tortrix moths)	Tortricidae Resources on the Net

Taxonomic identification report

Result overview

Sample details

Input DNA sequence

Analyst evaluation

Identification of candidate species

Candidate species